Utilities
Named case study · Scale & assessor adoption
Pacific Gas and Electric scaled the program from two assessors to twenty-six in six months.
How the largest energy provider in the United States took an assessment method from a two-person pilot to organisation-wide field coverage.
2 → 26
trained assessors in six months, at the largest US energy provider
Situation
Pacific Gas and Electric — the largest energy provider in the United States — runs physically demanding field work across an enormous, geographically dispersed network: confined spaces, elevated work, and conditions a lab-based assessment never sees. Managing musculoskeletal risk at that scale meant reaching work a small central ergonomics team could never get to in person.
Complication
PG&E set four concrete requirements before it would adopt an assessment method at scale: workers had to get instant feedback they could see; assessments had to work in confined spaces and on elevated work; risk had to be assessable from a safe distance; and the data had to flow through an API into a centralised ergonomic risk-management database. Most approaches met one or two. The method also had to be usable by people who weren't ergonomists.
Response
- Etiscope's sensor-based assessment met all four of PG&E's defined requirements — instant worker-visible feedback, confined-space and elevated-work capability, safe-distance assessment, and an API into PG&E's centralised database.
- Because the assessment doesn't require ergonomics expertise to operate, PG&E could train its own people rather than depend on a small specialist team.
- PG&E scaled assessor coverage deliberately — from an initial two trained assessors to twenty-six over six months — extending reach across its field operations.
Outcome
Pacific Gas and Electric scaled the program from two assessors to twenty-six in six months. PG&E's published evaluation documented that the platform met all four of its customer-defined requirements and that it was easy for non-ergonomists to learn and use — it did not require ergonomics expertise to operate.
Outcomes per PG&E's published evaluation of the platform.
How this generalises
Coverage is the constraint most safety programs hit first: a method only one or two specialists can run will only ever assess a fraction of the work. PG&E's pattern — a field-deployable assessment that non-specialists can run, feeding a central system through an API — is how a program scales from a handful of assessments to organisation-wide coverage without diluting the method.
Utilities solutions →